Rep. Kelly Louise Morrison, who represents Minnesota in the U.S. House, has filed a Periodic Transaction Report disclosing the sale of stock in Andersen Corporation, the window and door manufacturer based in Bayport, Wisconsin. The filing lists the transaction as a sale made by the member of Congress herself, held through an account identified as Investment Fund 1, with a value range of $100,001 to $250,000.
According to the disclosure, the sale took place on September 15, 2025. The report itself, however, was not filed until roughly 185 days after that date. The STOCK Act requires members of Congress to disclose covered transactions within 45 days of execution, so this filing arrives well outside that window. No explanation for the delay is included in the report, and none is speculated here — the filing simply shows both the transaction date and the later filing date on record.
What the Filing Actually Says
Congressional disclosure forms are brief by design. They do not include a purchase price, an exact number of shares, or the reasoning behind a trade. What is on record is the asset name, the type of transaction, a dollar range rather than an exact figure, and a short filer-provided description — in this case simply ‘Window Manufacturer, Bayport, WI,’ which appears to be a plain identification of Andersen Corporation’s business rather than any additional financial detail.
Andersen Corporation is a privately held manufacturer, notable in this context because most STOCK Act disclosures involving individual companies concern publicly traded stock. The [OI] designation attached to the asset in the filing indicates this is categorized as an other investment interest rather than a straightforward equity holding, which is consistent with Andersen’s private ownership structure.
Why These Reports Get Attention
Search interest in congressional trading disclosures has grown steadily, with readers looking for tools and trackers — the kind of queries that lead people to terms like capitol trades or requests for a capitol trades api free — as more people try to follow which members of Congress are buying or selling assets and when. Late filings like this one are a routine, if imperfect, part of that transparency system. The STOCK Act’s 45-day requirement exists precisely so the public can review these transactions close to when they happen, and filings submitted months late reduce that window of visibility even though they remain fully compliant once submitted.
This report reflects a legal disclosure obligation, not an allegation of wrongdoing. Nothing in the filing indicates why the report was delayed or suggests any violation beyond the timing gap itself.